The Underlying Reason why Trump could Side with the Anti-3D-Guns

On July 10th 2018, the Department of State under Trump’s administration settled to allow Defense Distributed (3D guns blueprint maker) to publish their blueprint freely on the internet, plus paying $40,000 compensation for Defense Distributed’s legal cost over the years.

Later on July 31st 2018 however, many states joined force to file a lawsuit against trump’s administration for this decision. Thus blocking Defense Distributed operations temporarily.

On the same day, President Trump tweeted

On Aug 27th 2018, a Seattle federal judge ruled against Defense Distributed, continuing the temporary ban on distribution of 3D guns blueprint. Most of the reasoning is kind of technical, citing that the Department of State did not formally notify Congress when it modified the United States Munitions List. Defense Distributed announced that it planned to sell 3D guns blueprint directly instead.

About President Trump’s tweet, it’s mostly politics, a game of gaining support and negotiating benefits. As the saying goes “Politics makes strange bedfellows.”

By supporting 3D printed gun rights, Trump will likely gain little to none additional voter’s satisfaction. On the other hand, opposing 3D printed guns will make gun control group see Trump in a better light, while losing minimal support from gun rights group.


Why is that the case? That’s because even though gun control advocates fear the worst for 3D printed guns, 99% of gun owners couldn’t care less about 3D printed guns.

History of Defense Distributed’s 3D printed guns up until now (Aug. 25 2018)

To fully understand this 3D printed guns topic, let’s look at how the chain of events have formed.

Year Event
Aug 2012 Defense Distributed planned to design a 3D gun that could be downloaded and reproduced by anybody.
May 5, 2013 First working blueprint of a 3D gun
More than 100,000 downloads within 2 days.
Within days, U.S. State Department demanded that the blueprints be pulled off DD’s website.
Defense Distributed complied. But there are lots of ongoing mirror sites offering the blueprint.
May 6, 2015 Defense Distributed filed a Constitutional challenge against the State Department
Aug 2015 District Court for Western Texas in Austin denied Defense Distributed’s preliminary injunction request.
September 2016 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit similarly ruled against Defense Distributed
August 2017 Defense Distributed filed a petition with the Supreme Court
January 8, 2018 Petition denied
July 10, 2018 *Defense Distributed accepted a settlement from Department of State, enabling it to continue its operations.
Defense Distributed received $40,000 to compensate its legal costs over the years.
July 31, 2018 Many states joined force to file a lawsuit against.
A temporary restraining order was issued by U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik on July 31, 2018.
Additional lawsuits have been filed by both sides.
Aug 1, 2018 President Trump tweeted about 3d guns.
Aug 27, 2018 A Seattle federal judge ruled against Defense Distributed, continuing the temporary ban on distribution of 3D guns blueprint.
Defense Distributed announced that it planned to sell 3D guns blueprint directly instead.

Sources :


As you can see, there is a surprise pivot of opinion from the Department of State on July 10, 2018.

Let’s take a break from the head-aching legal issues and focus on why 3D printed guns is an issue in the first place.

Why gun control advocates fear the worst for 3D printed guns?

20 states that joined the lawsuit against online distribution of blueprints for 3D printed guns.

These are the 20 states that joined the lawsuit against online distribution of blueprints for 3D printed guns :

Washington, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Maryland, New York, District of Columbia, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia

Sources :


Basically the fear for 3D printed guns revolves around 2 issues :

  1. Detectability
  2. Traceability



Imagine a world where metal detector no longer works. Criminals lurk at every corner with seemingly laughable plastic toys. Be it the white house, airports, subways and even your local convenience stores, nowhere is safe.

That’s a rather over-paranoid scenario. As officers can still check your belongings by hand. And ammunition is still needed for 3D printed guns to really shoot anything.

But you get the general idea.


Another factor is the “who”. Suppose a cop found a 3D printed gun in a crime scene. Can he know the owner or history of a gun by its serial number? Since in this theoretical world, so many individuals are printing their home-made guns. And would-be criminals wouldn’t bother to register/serialized their own object of crime. So I guess not.

Furthermore, all our background checks would be in vain. The criminals, the psychopath, the drunkards and the belligerent punks will print their lethal weapons at will.

With today’s technology of 3D printing, it’s a far-fetched story. But the future is still unknown and up for debate.

Looking for a scope for your AR-10? See Best AR10 Scope.


Why most gun owners couldn’t care less about 3D printed guns

Suppose a brand of orange from China cost thrice as much and tastes horrible. Would you buy it? Definitely not, unless you intend to give it to that super annoying neighbour. This is an analogy to 3D printed guns.

A dog with whatever sign

3D printed guns were a hype in its early days. However, after the hype died down came the dawning truth, “Anything that sounds too good to be true probably is, too good to be true.”

With current technology, quality and price of 3D printed guns are so inferior compared to regular firearms.

Another fact is that, if a gun enthusiast wants to make his/her own gun, there are already fully legal ways to do that.


3D printed guns are mostly made of either ABS or PLA plastic. And these plastics just simply cannot handle heat and forces as much as metal.

In the earliest version of 3D printed guns, the “liberator”, you would have 50% chance of printing a fireable gun. Also, these 3D printed guns might also explode at the shooter when firing, duh.

With the latest version, the capability of firing 100-200 rounds is about the limit of a 3D printed gun.


Normal-home-use 3D printers are not capable enough to print a quality 3D gun. You’d need a high quality printer costing up to $10,000.

As stated earlier, a plastic 3D guns are much less durable. So some people suggest the use of metal 3D printers. But those 3D printers that can use steel, aluminum, nickel, or other metal powders start at well over $100,000.

Compare that to how you can just buy your AR-15 at a price ranging from $600-$2500, the 3D printed guns seems a ridiculous proposal.

Alternatives to 3D printed guns

The truth is, the law already allows people to buy fully-working, commercial grade parts and assemble a gun. You can even do it without serialization as long as you don’t transfer that gun.

And yes, quality is way better and prices are cheaper.

If you’re interested in shooting long range but don’t have a long range scope, see Best Long Range Scope and Long Range Scope on a Budget.


So, who really support these 3D printed guns?

From what I can gather, these are :

  1. Defense Distributed and similar corporations
  2. 3D printing enthusiasts who are interest in 3D printed guns
  3. People who feel that by blocking 3D guns blueprint, the government is violating free speech.


What would a ban really do to 3D printed guns blueprint

Since May 2013, the 3D guns blueprint were taken off Defense Distributed’s website. However, you and I can still download these exact blueprints from many websites such as :,,

The PirateBay homepage

Similar to pirated music and software, once the files are released onto the internet, it becomes extremely hard to fully regulate. There just isn’t a way to regulate every website on the internet at the moment.

A memo from Department of Homeland Security accepted the fact that “preventing the creation of 3D-printed guns could be an extremely challenging if not impossible endeavor”.

Looking for a great hunting scope? See Best Hunting Scope and Best .308 Scope.


A guess on who oppose/support the distribution of 3D Printed Gun blueprints

In this section, I’ll be making assumptions on what each group thinks on this 3D printed guns topic. Also, I’ll try to guess what would happen in both outcomes of banning or allowing the distribution of 3D Printed gun blueprints

Warning : Even though I try to be logical, prepare for some BS.

1. President Trump

Since President Trump is a politician, he’ll likely do something to gain more political support. Thus he would opposee the distribution of 3D guns blueprint.

Banning 3D guns scenario :

  • He’ll gain more favor from the anti-gun group without losing support from gun-rights group (because few gun-rights people care for 3D guns).
  • 3D guns blueprint files will still be on the internet.

Allowing 3D guns scenario :

  • He’ll gain support from Defense Distributed (<20 employees).
  • 3D guns blueprint files will still be on the internet.

Likely case : Oppose the distribution of 3D guns blueprint

2. NRA

In this 3D printed guns debate, the NRA didn’t stand out much. They just pointed out that undetectable 3D printed guns are illegal for 30 years, according to the Undetectable Firearms Act 1988. Many 3D printed gun designers circumvent this issue by inserting a metal bar of about 6 inches into the 3D printed guns.

Since the NRA is financially backed by gun manufacturers, the future possibility of high quality home-made guns is a big no. However, that is still some very long time in the future. Plus they would want to promote the rights protection against the government, thus they should have a mixed stance.

Banning 3D guns scenario :

  • They will not lose support from gun-rights group (because few gun-rights people care for 3D guns).

Allowing 3D guns scenario :

  • They will angry some of their financial backers.
  • They will get to support the first amendment, which is not their primary goal.

Likely case : Neutral

3. Cody Wilson & Defense Distributed

Defense Distributed is a non-profit organization. And Cody Wilson earned money from his other product, the “ghost gunner”. The 3D printing debate has already given Cody Wilson free publicity and he is, in my humble opinion, satisfied.

Banning 3D guns scenario :

  • Gained publicity from the event

Allowing 3D guns scenario :

  • Gained bigger publicity from the event
  • May offer some additional products regarding 3D printing guns

Likely case : Support the distribution of 3D guns blueprint

4. 3D printing community

The 3D printing community can sell more 3D printers and make more profit. However, this also put them in political spotlight.

Banning 3D guns scenario :

  • They’ll just find new things to 3D print, and life goes on.

Allowing 3D guns scenario :

  • They will slightly sell 3D printer better
  • More needs for metal 3D printers
  • Put them in a political spotlight

Likely case : Neutral

5. Criminals

Criminals in the U.S. should find it easier to acquire guns elsewhere rather than 3D printing. But in some countries where guns are scarce, 3D printing guns might be a viable option.

Banning 3D guns scenario :

  • They don’t care about the law anyway
  • The advancement of 3D printing guns might be a bit slower

Allowing 3D guns scenario :

  • The advancement of 3D printing guns should be faster
  • Some criminals might even turn to honest application of 3D printing guns

Likely case : Neutral

The potential for 3D printed weapons

Even though today we can safely laugh ourselves out at the prospect of 3D printing weapons, the future might prove to be a whole different thing. Here’s why :

Metal 3D printers (DMLS)

1. The cost of 3D metal printers are falling rapidly

According to, older models of 3D metal printers used to cost $800,000. Nowadays a desktop sized metal 3D printer costs only $120,000.

As people start to adopt the technology more, the cost of these devices could continue to fall.

2. The potential for creative design still lies dormant

According to a scholarly article from Lipson and Kurman, Fabricated, people haven’t been utilizing the potential of 3D printing yet.

The power of 3D printing is not how cheap it can produce. But it’s rather the power of customization. Lipson and Kurman pointed out that a 3D-printed firearms can be designed to look like a shoe or a hairbrush or a soda bottle.

A 3D-printing industry analyst Alex Chausovsky also said, “Think of master bombmakers in the Middle East making new designs that look like everyday products.

So what if a plastic firearm can fire only 10 rounds. As long as it cannot be detected ….

3. Other 3D printing weapons

Usually the debate with gun group is put on spotlight, and many people would emotionally be focused on “guns”. But what about other lethal weapons that can be created by 3D printing. Here’s a small list of those:

Looking for a scope for your AR-15? See Best AR15 Scope.



The most politically logical choice for President Trump and his administration is to oppose the 3D printed guns. In other words, this choice gives the most benefit to President Trump.

This is due to the fact that few people actually support 3D-printed-guns. 3D printed guns are low quality and ridiculously high priced at this point in time. And nobody really loses if 3D printed guns are to be banned

However, like any ground-breaking technology (Internet, blockchain, AI), the ban will have little effect. People with interests in 3D-printing-weapons can and will still print weapons from it.

It’s not that 3D printing is evil. It’s just that 3D printing is new and powerful.

Since the future potential is high, it’s very likely that 3D printed guns and weapons will play a bigger role in our future society.

Social Share

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.



About us


Hi there. We are a group of shooting/hunting enthusiasts. Our goal is to make shooting/hunting popular again by making things easier for beginners.


If you have any questions, comments and/or suggestions, please contact us here.